Renovation Guide 裝修指南

Pros

• + No hacking — installs over existing tiles
• + Fully waterproof; ideal for HK humidity
• + Comfortable and warm underfoot
• + Easy to replace individual planks
• + 免拆磚，直接覆蓋現有磚面
• + 完全防水，適合香港潮濕環境
• + 踩感舒適，腳感溫暖
• + 個別板材易於更換

Cons

• − Cannot be sanded or refinished
• − Lower perceived value than real hardwood
• − Heavy furniture dragging can gouge surface
• − 無法打磨翻新
• − 質感感知遜於實木
• − 拖拉重傢俬可能刮花表面

Pros

• + Real wood surface — can be lightly sanded and refinished
• + Warmer underfoot than stone or vinyl
• + Strong resale and perceived value
• + 真木面層，可輕度打磨翻新
• + 比石材或乙烯基腳感更溫暖
• + 高感知價值，有助提升物業吸引力

Cons

• − Must acclimatise 5–7 days; glue-down required in HK humidity
• − Avoid wet areas — moisture causes warping
• − Higher cost than SPC
• − 需現場適應 5–7 天，香港環境須膠黏施工
• − 避免濕區——潮濕導致變形翹曲
• − 成本高於石塑地板

Pros

• + Fully waterproof — suitable for wet areas where real wood fails
• + Durable and scratch-resistant surface
• + Low maintenance; no sealing required
• + Wood look without humidity concerns
• + 完全防水，適用於真木無法使用的濕區
• + 耐用耐刮的表面
• + 易於保養，無需密封處理
• + 木材外觀，無需擔心潮濕問題

Cons

• − Grout lines interrupt the wood pattern illusion
• − Cold and hard underfoot compared to real timber
• − Lower perceived value than engineered hardwood
• − 填縫線打斷木紋視覺效果
• − 腳感較真木冰冷堅硬
• − 感知價值低於實木複合地板

Pros

• + Full-body — chips show same colour as surface
• + Suitable for floors and walls including wet areas
• + Wide selection; competitive pricing at most HK suppliers
• + 全瓷通體——崩角顏色與表面一致
• + 適用於地面及牆身包括濕區
• + 選擇豐富；香港各大供應商價格具競爭力

Cons

• − Pattern repeat visible in large areas without careful layout planning
• − Polished variants show footprints and watermarks in daily use
• − Less character than large-format or natural stone
• − 大面積鋪貼若不注意排布易見花紋重複
• − 拋光面日常使用下易留腳印及水印
• − 視覺個性不及大板或天然石材

Pros

• + Lower cost than porcelain for equivalent coverage
• + Lighter weight — easier to handle and cut on site
• + Wide decorative range; many textured and handmade-look options
• + 同等面積成本低於瓷磚
• + 重量輕——現場搬運及切割較方便
• + 裝飾選擇豐富；多款仿手工及立體紋理款式

Cons

• − Higher water absorption than porcelain — not suitable for floor wet areas
• − Softer glaze chips more easily at edges and corners
• − Cannot be used on floors where heavy loads or trolleys are expected
• − 吸水率高於瓷磚——不適合用於地面濕區
• − 釉面較軟，邊角較易崩裂
• − 不適用於需承受重物或手推車的地面

Pros

• + Fewer grout lines — cleaner, more hygienic visual
• + Extremely durable and scratch-resistant
• + Wide pattern range including stone and concrete looks
• + 灰縫更少，視覺更潔淨衛生
• + 極耐用，抗刮花
• + 款式廣泛，包括仿石材及仿混凝土效果

Cons

• − Heavy — installation rate halves vs. standard tile
• − Substrate must be flat to ±2mm or hollow spots result
• − Costly and disruptive to replace if cracked
• − 重量大，施工速度較標準磚慢一半
• − 底層須達 ±2mm 平整度，否則易空鼓
• − 破裂後更換成本高且工程繁複

Pros

• + High design impact from small surface area
• + Available in glass, natural stone, and ceramic
• + Ideal for wet-area feature walls and shower niches
• + 少量面積可創造高視覺衝擊效果
• + 有玻璃、天然石及陶瓷款式
• + 適用於濕區特色牆及花灑壁龕

Cons

• − Labour-intensive — many small joints require precision and more time
• − High grout-line density increases long-term cleaning effort
• − Pattern centring requires layout planning before any adhesive is set
• − 施工費工——大量細縫需精準對齊，耗時較長
• − 大量灰縫增加長期清潔難度
• − 圖案居中需在上膠前預先規劃排布

Pros

• + Widest colour range — most brands offer 1,000+ custom mix options
• + Easy to touch up; multiple repaint cycles without stripping
• + Lowest cost per sqm of all wall finish options
• + 色彩選擇最廣——大多數品牌提供逾 1,000 種自調色
• + 易於補色；可多次重新粉刷而毋須鏟底
• + 所有牆身飾面選擇中每平方米成本最低

Cons

• − Flat sheen is not washable — scuffs and stains require repainting
• − Lower-grade emulsions yellow near cooking areas over time
• − No breathability benefit — does not reduce condensation on cold walls
• − 啞光面不耐洗——污漬及刮花須重新粉刷
• − 較低級乳膠漆長期近烹飪區域易泛黃
• − 無透氣性優勢——無助減少冷牆結露

Pros

• + Active mould inhibitor — essential for HK's humid season (April–September)
• + Available across most standard paint ranges with no special application required
• + Some formulations also reduce surface condensation
• + 主動防霉——香港潮濕季節（四至九月）的必要選擇
• + 大多數標準油漆系列均有提供，施工方法無特別要求
• + 部分配方同時具備減少牆面結露的功效

Cons

• − Biocide effectiveness diminishes over 3–5 years; reapplication needed
• − Does not fix the underlying moisture source — damp walls will mould again regardless
• − Surface prep is mandatory: existing mould must be treated with fungicidal wash before painting
• − 殺菌劑效能在 3–5 年後減退，需重新粉刷
• − 不能解決根本滲水問題——潮濕牆身無論如何仍會發霉
• − 底層處理必不可少：粉刷前須以殺菌劑清洗現有霉菌

Pros

• + Near-zero VOC — safest for post-renovation indoor air quality
• + Breathable surface reduces condensation-driven mould on cold exterior walls
• + Distinctive matte depth — layered texture unavailable in standard emulsion
• + 近零 VOC——裝修後室內空氣質素最安全的選擇
• + 透氣牆面減少冷外牆因結露引起的霉菌問題
• + 獨特啞光深度——分層質感是普通乳膠漆無法複製的

Cons

• − Cannot apply directly over existing gloss or semi-gloss paint without stripping or specialist primer
• − Less washable than emulsion — requires touch-up rather than wiping
• − Application is skill-sensitive; uneven technique shows under raking light
• − 不可直接塗於現有光澤或半光面漆，須先鏟底或使用專用底漆
• − 耐洗性不及乳膠漆——污漬須補色而非抹走
• − 施工技術要求高；在斜角光源下不均勻手法清晰可見

Pros

• + Seamless — no joints, grout lines, or panel edges
• + Works on walls, floors, and countertops in a single material language
• + Industrial texture without the structural load of poured concrete
• + 完全無縫——無接縫、灰縫或板材邊緣
• + 牆身、地面及台面可使用同一材料語言
• + 工業質感而無澆築混凝土的結構負荷

Cons

• − Highly skill-dependent — surface defects visible under any directional light
• − Requires penetrating sealer on installation and annual resealing
• − Any damage requires the original specialist to repair; cannot be patched with standard filler
• − 極度依賴施工技術——任何方向光源下瑕疵清晰可見
• − 安裝時須塗封石劑，並每年重新封石
• − 任何損壞須由原施工專家修復，不能以普通填補物修補

Pros

• + Lowest formaldehyde — melamine film bonded at mill, no site adhesive
• + Interior and exterior faces carry the same finish (內外見光)
• + Cost-effective for large wardrobe and cabinet runs
• + 甲醛含量最低——三聚氰胺膜於工廠壓製，現場無需用膠
• + 內外見光，表裡如一
• + 大型衣櫃及廚櫃工程性價比高

Cons

• − Thin film (0.1–0.2mm) — lacks the tactile depth of HPL or real veneer
• − Colour and pattern range narrower than spray lacquer
• − Cannot be repainted or refinished on site
• − 薄膜（0.1–0.2mm），質感不及膠板或實木皮
• − 色彩及花紋選擇不及焗油豐富
• − 現場無法重新上漆或翻新

Pros

• + 1mm thick surface with genuine tactile depth
• + Extremely durable and scratch-resistant
• + Fire-rated; wide colour and pattern range
• + 1mm 厚飾面，質感真實
• + 極耐用，抗刮花
• + 防火等級；色彩及花紋選擇豐富

Cons

• − Contact adhesive bonding is the primary formaldehyde source — adhesive quality varies by contractor
• − Premium cost; interior faces are plain unless separately specified
• − More common in commercial than residential
• − 接觸膠黏合是主要甲醛來源——膠水質量因承建商而異
• − 價格較高；內面需另行指定才有飾面
• − 較多用於商業而非住宅項目

Pros

• + Lowest formaldehyde — melamine film bonded at mill, no site adhesive
• + Interior and exterior faces carry the same finish (內外見光)
• + Cost-effective for large wardrobe and cabinet runs
• + 甲醛含量最低——三聚氰胺膜於工廠壓製，現場無需用膠
• + 內外見光，表裡如一
• + 大型衣櫃及廚櫃工程性價比高

Cons

• − Thin film (0.1–0.2mm) — lacks the tactile depth of HPL or real veneer
• − Colour and pattern range narrower than spray lacquer
• − Cannot be repainted or refinished on site
• − 薄膜（0.1–0.2mm），質感不及膠板或實木皮
• − 色彩及花紋選擇不及焗油豐富
• − 現場無法重新上漆或翻新

Pros

• + Genuine 1mm surface depth — more tactile than melamine
• + Extremely scratch and impact resistant
• + Fire-rated; wide colour and pattern catalogue (Formica, 火立克 etc.)
• + 1mm 真實飾面厚度，質感優於生態板
• + 極耐刮擦及撞擊
• + 防火等級；色彩及花紋款式豐富（Formica、火立克等）

Cons

• − Contact adhesive is the main formaldehyde variable — quality varies by contractor
• − Interior faces are plain unless explicitly specified (adds cost)
• − More common in commercial fit-outs; premium over 生態板 for residential
• − 接觸膠是甲醛的主要變量——膠水質量因承建商而異
• − 內面需另行指定才有飾面，否則為素面（增加成本）
• − 商業裝修較常用；住宅用途成本高於生態板

Pros

• + Authentic natural wood grain — highest visual quality of all four
• + Can be stained to any tone; unique character in every board
• + Adds genuine material warmth that printed finishes cannot replicate
• + 天然實木紋理——四種選擇中視覺質量最高
• + 可染成任何色調；每塊板材具獨特質感
• + 帶來印刷飾面無法複製的真實物料溫暖感

Cons

• − Multiple finish layers (stain + lacquer) — each contributes formaldehyde; solvent-based lacquers especially
• − Moisture-sensitive at edges if not properly sealed; avoid humid environments
• − Requires periodic recoating (every 5–8 years); highest long-term maintenance
• − 多層工序（索色加保護層）——每層均釋放甲醛，油性漆尤甚
• − 邊緣若未妥善封邊對潮濕敏感；避免用於高濕度環境
• − 需定期重新噴塗（每 5–8 年）；長期維護要求最高

Pros

• + Smooth seamless solid-colour result; high-gloss options available
• + Colour matched to any RAL or Pantone specification
• + Clean, minimalist aesthetic well-suited to contemporary interiors
• + 色面平滑無縫，可選高光效果
• + 可按 RAL 或 Pantone 任意配色
• + 簡潔現代的質感，適合當代室內設計

Cons

• − Highest VOC and odour of all four finishes — especially solvent-based; specify water-based
• − Susceptible to edge chipping at corners; difficult to patch invisibly
• − MDF substrate has poor moisture resistance — avoid for bathroom vanities
• − 四種飾面中 VOC 及氣味最重——尤其油性漆；請指定水性漆
• − 邊角易崩裂，難以隱形修補
• − MDF 底材耐潮性差——不建議用於浴室櫃

Pros

• + Consistent pattern — no bookmatching required
• + No sealing needed; very hard and scratch-resistant
• + Non-porous; hygienic for food preparation
• + 花紋均一，無需對紋
• + 無需封石；硬度高，抗刮花
• + 無孔隙，符合食品安全衛生要求

Cons

• − Chips at edges if struck; cannot be repaired invisibly
• − Not UV-stable — avoid outdoor use (resin binder fades)
• − Very heavy — structural support required for long overhangs
• − 受撞擊易崩邊，修復後難以完全隱形
• − 不耐紫外線——避免戶外使用（樹脂結合劑會褪色）
• − 重量大——長懸臂需加強結構支撐

Pros

• + Invisible joins — ideal for long continuous runs
• + Integrated sinks possible with no junction to trap bacteria
• + Surface scratches can be sanded out and refinished
• + 接縫完全隱形，適合長連續台面
• + 可製作一體式洗手盆，無接縫積菌
• + 表面刮痕可打磨修復翻新

Cons

• − Softer than quartz — scratches more easily in daily use
• − Low heat resistance — trivets essential; direct pots will mark
• − Higher cost than quartz for equivalent coverage
• − 比石英石較軟，日常使用較易刮花
• − 耐熱性低——必須使用隔熱墊；直接放鍋會留痕
• − 同等面積成本高於石英石

Pros

• + UV-stable — suitable for outdoor kitchens and balconies
• + Near-zero porosity; no sealing ever required
• + Heat and scratch resistant; direct pots and pans safe
• + Large format slabs with consistent veining for bookmatching
• + 耐紫外線——適用於戶外廚房及露台
• + 近乎零孔隙，永不需要封石
• + 耐熱耐刮，可直接放置鍋具
• + 大板規格，石紋均一，適合對紋拼接

Cons

• − Brittle under point impact — chips at unsupported edges
• − Requires specialised cutting tools on site
• − Premium cost — significantly higher than quartz
• − 受點狀衝擊易崩裂——無支撐邊角特別脆弱
• − 現場切割需要專用工具
• − 高端價位——成本顯著高於石英石

Pros

• + Unique natural veining — each slab one-of-a-kind
• + Premium aesthetic; adds property value
• + Cool surface — ideal for pastry and baking areas
• + 天然石紋獨一無二，每塊石板各異
• + 高端質感，提升物業價值
• + 表面涼爽，適合烘焙區域

Cons

• − Porous — must seal on install and annually; etches from acids (lemon, vinegar)
• − Polished finish slippery when wet — specify honed or brushed for floors
• − Highest maintenance of all worktop options
• − 多孔——安裝時及每年須封石；接觸酸性物質（檸檬、醋）會侵蝕表面
• − 拋光面潮濕時易滑——地面請指定啞光或拉絲面
• − 所有台面選擇中維護要求最高

Pros

• + Factory-calibrated ratio — consistent quality vs. site-mixed alternatives
• + Cementitious — excellent bond to concrete substrate
• + Flexible when cured; accommodates minor structural movement
• + 廠家配比，質量穩定，優於現場自調產品
• + 水泥基配方——與混凝土底層黏結力強
• + 固化後具彈性，可適應輕微結構移動

Cons

• − Requires correct on-site mixing — poor technique negates the factory calibration
• − Not suitable for negative-pressure (external leakage) scenarios
• − Substrate must be clean, sound, and damp-cured before application
• − 須正確現場攪拌——操作不當會令廠家配比失效
• − 不適用於負壓（外牆滲水）情況
• − 底層須潔淨、穩固並預先濕潤後才可施工

Pros

• + Only viable option when exterior face is inaccessible (party walls, below-grade)
• + Epoxy-modified — resists hydrostatic pressure from behind
• + Does not require excavation or external access
• + 外側無法施工時（共用牆、地下層）的唯一可行方案
• + 環氧改性配方——可抵抗背面水壓
• + 無需挖掘或外側進場施工

Cons

• − Substrate preparation is critical — must be mechanically keyed; any weakness causes delamination
• − More expensive than positive-pressure systems
• − Remedial use only — not a first-choice for new construction
• − 底層處理至關重要——須機械打毛；任何薄弱位置均可能導致脫層
• − 成本高於正壓防水系統
• − 僅用於補救工程——新建工程不建議作首選